At 22 Oct 2011 14:11:40 -0400 JF Mezei wrote:
> Alan Browne wrote:
>
> > I really think Ballmer is an insane idiot.
>
> He's richer than you and me combined. He can't be that much of an idiot.
>
> He may have horrible public speaking skills, but he wouldn't be where he
> is today if he were totally stupid.
>
> And consider that his speech may appear to be stupid, but might in fact
> have been carefully crafted as a strategic move to give Microsoft a
> piece of the market.
>
> And while internaly, MS may know exactly how thair market share is
> growing or not growing, when making public speeches, everything will be
> very pink.
>
> Note that Apple does the same. On some metrics, the iPhone is losing
> market share because of arrival of Android and (to a lesser extent
> Windows). Yet, at keynotes, it manages to find ways to spin the numbers
> to make Apple look #1. Microsoft does the same.
>
>
> > You squirm in your seat when he's pitching trying to out-Steve Steve.
>
> I have news for you. many have the exact same reaction when they see
> steve jobs speak.
I just found it amusing when he spun negatives into positives or non-
issues. (Try not to laugh when he excitedly explained in the original
iPhone keynote how turning songs you already owned into ringtones would
"only cost you $0.99!"
> The one difference is that Steve Jobs makes excellent presentations, so
> even if the content makes some stomachs turn (like Balmer does to you),
> people learn from his presentation skills.
Absolutely. Jobs was a master of his craft, and people will copy his
style for decades to come.
> > I have yet to see a Windows 7 smart phone in the wild.
>
> I have let to see the current iPod Nano's in the wild. But I am told
> they are out there and that Apple has sold a few dozens of them.
>
> Dont forget that the real unveiling of Windows phone stuff comes soon
> when Nokia (the Microsoft arm that makes phones) will unveil its first
> batch of Windows phones.
>
> I don't think anyone can predict whether Nokia's wedding to Microsoft
> will succeed or whether it will drive Nokia to bankrupcy. Nokia has
> enough clout with mobile operators around the world to really push its
> products. It has the potential to really make that Windows thing succeed.
MS stands to gain a lot from Nokia, particularly internationally, from in-
place agreements. MS will likely get the Zune music service in more
countries via the existing Ovi agreements, Ovi maps cover the world,
whereas Bing's just suck outside North America and the UK, etc.
> What I don't know is how much time to give Nokia before concluding that
> Windows (and Nokia) will flop on mobile phones. I feel sorry for Nokia
> though, they used to be way ahead of everyone in mobile phones and lost
> their edge in the first decade of 2000. No corporation is immune from
> bad management. Now, in a desperate act, they chose to not only get in
> bed with Microsoft, but et the company on the success of Windows on
phones.
Nokia was left with few options. Symbian/Meego were dying, and becoming
Yet Another Android vendor wasn't going to save them. For good or bad,
Windows Phone represents a differentiation that will make Nokia standout.
MS' other WP OEMs are mostly half-assing it by recycling older hardware
designs (either WinMo or Android) and shoveling the WP7 OS on it.
(Though on fairness, Nokia is probably doing the same short term to rush
out their first WP phones. The excellent Meego-based N9 is likely to
resource with a new name and WP installed.)
> I is possible that this time around, Microsoft might have enough stamina
> to continue to develop the mobile version of Windows until it takes off.
> In the past, MS always gave up on the mobile market. Do the terms
> WindowsCE and PocketPC right a bell ?
Windows CE, now called Windows Embedded, is still in use, probably
powering the last gas pump you filled up at!