Jason S

source:
http://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/01/...hange-is-fake/

So,

someone has some explaining to do. But it's good to know that those
e-mails were fake, IMO.

--
Jason

Rocky

On Jul 2, 10:41*am, Jason S <jasonsav...@me.com> wrote:
> source:http://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/01/...ve-jobs-email-...
>
> So,
>
> someone has some explaining to do. But it's good to know that those
> e-mails were fake, IMO.
>
> --
> Jason

just read about it.. need to hang on for a while
what exactly happened. any way it's not gud time
for Jobs.

I See

Jason S wrote:
> source:
> http://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/01/...hange-is-fake/
>
> So,
>
> someone has some explaining to do. But it's good to know that those
> e-mails were fake, IMO.

Yeah, but it still does damage.
Once the image of Jobs responding in that way enters the mind, it reshapes
outlying perceptions - regardless of any subsequent discreditation.

I See

I See wrote:
> Jason S wrote:
>> source:
>> http://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/01/...hange-is-fake/
>>
>> So,
>>
>> someone has some explaining to do. But it's good to know that those
>> e-mails were fake, IMO.
>
> Yeah, but it still does damage.
> Once the image of Jobs responding in that way enters the mind, it
> reshapes outlying perceptions - regardless of any subsequent
> discreditation.

..... a bit like a prosecution lawyer presenting inadmissable evidence - it
matters little that the judge subsequently instructs the jury to disregard
it.

salgud

On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:39:11 +0100, I See wrote:

> Jason S wrote:
>> source:
>> http://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/01/...hange-is-fake/
>>
>> So,
>>
>> someone has some explaining to do. But it's good to know that those
>> e-mails were fake, IMO.
>
> Yeah, but it still does damage.
> Once the image of Jobs responding in that way enters the mind, it reshapes
> outlying perceptions - regardless of any subsequent discreditation.

Can I ask, what is an "outlying perception"?

I See

salgud wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:39:11 +0100, I See wrote:
>
>> Jason S wrote:
>>> source:
>>> http://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/01/...hange-is-fake/
>>>
>>> So,
>>>
>>> someone has some explaining to do. But it's good to know that those
>>> e-mails were fake, IMO.
>>
>> Yeah, but it still does damage.
>> Once the image of Jobs responding in that way enters the mind, it
>> reshapes outlying perceptions - regardless of any subsequent
>> discreditation.
>
> Can I ask, what is an "outlying perception"?

A perception that's outlying.

salgud

On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:56:06 +0100, I See wrote:

> salgud wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:39:11 +0100, I See wrote:
>>
>>> Jason S wrote:
>>>> source:
>>>> http://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/01/...hange-is-fake/
>>>>
>>>> So,
>>>>
>>>> someone has some explaining to do. But it's good to know that those
>>>> e-mails were fake, IMO.
>>>
>>> Yeah, but it still does damage.
>>> Once the image of Jobs responding in that way enters the mind, it
>>> reshapes outlying perceptions - regardless of any subsequent
>>> discreditation.
>>
>> Can I ask, what is an "outlying perception"?
>
> A perception that's outlying.

I didn't think it made any sense either.

I See

salgud wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 15:56:06 +0100, I See wrote:
>
>> salgud wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:39:11 +0100, I See wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jason S wrote:
>>>>> source:
>>>>> http://www.macrumors.com/2010/07/01/...hange-is-fake/
>>>>>
>>>>> So,
>>>>>
>>>>> someone has some explaining to do. But it's good to know that
>>>>> those e-mails were fake, IMO.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, but it still does damage.
>>>> Once the image of Jobs responding in that way enters the mind, it
>>>> reshapes outlying perceptions - regardless of any subsequent
>>>> discreditation.
>>>
>>> Can I ask, what is an "outlying perception"?
>>
>> A perception that's outlying.
>
> I didn't think it made any sense either.

Don't sweat it.
Language isn't everybody's forte.