![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"I See" <mouchie@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:8e7tnrFo5bU1@mid.individual.net... > Yeah, 'Remove Recents' > > Add the SinfuliPhone repo and install 'Multifl0w cracked' and 'Disable > iOS4 MultiTasking' .... way better than the crappy native 4 switching. > Mine is called Remove Background. I like the "multitasking" and like this way of closing them all down at once. -- www.myconeyislandmemories.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Michelle Steiner" <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in message news:michelle-01AD00.15213701092010@news.eternal-september.org... > In article <i5met2$6rj$1@news.eternal-september.org>, > "JKConey" <jkconey@verizon.net> wrote: > >> Seems like when I'm wishing there was a way to get something done, >> whoosh >> it appears on Cydia. I was thinking how annoying it is to keep closing >> down all the open "links" on the multitasking bar one by one. Just >> popped up an app that closes them all at once with one push of my >> choice. Nothing major, but one more reason I'm happy being jailbroken. > > I don't bother to close them; don't see the need. > You don't see any battery life degrading, even with a couple dozen open? -- www.myconeyislandmemories.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Allistar <me@hiddenaddress.com> wrote:
> nospam wrote: > > > In article <bpydncOMz_TNTuPRnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Allistar > > <me@hiddenaddress.com> wrote: > > > >> >> it appears on Cydia. I was thinking how annoying it is to keep closing > >> >> down all the open "links" on the multitasking bar one by one. Just > >> >> popped up an app that closes them all at once with one push of my > >> >> choice. Nothing major, but one more reason I'm happy being jailbroken. > >> > > >> > I don't bother to close them; don't see the need. > >> > >> I would have expected a running app to be automatically closed after a > >> certain amount of time of not being used (say, 5 minutes?) What's the > >> logic in leaving them open (or at least, having them appear in the > >> running tasks list)? > > > > apps are suspended, so it doesn't matter if it's 5 minutes or 5 days. > > they are not running, except for specific types of apps such as > > background audio or gps navigation. > > > > the list is not running tasks, it's recently used apps. the user might > > want to go back to an app they used the day or week before, and since > > it's suspended, it instantly resumes. if it had been shut down, it > > would need to relaunch, which is slower. > > Which implies that every app on that list is consuming a certain amount of > resources. Except that they may not be (apart from the simple list keeping track of which apps have been launched, which has barely any overhead). The app will only be suspended and held in RAM for as long as it suits the OS to do so. If the OS needs the memory for something else (such as the user running another memory hungry app), suspended apps are dumped from RAM and will have to be relaunched from flash if the user switches back to them. > It would be nice to be able to control it so those resources were > freed when the app is closed. When I run an app for the first time on my > iPhone, I don't notice any delay - it's pretty much instant. For apps which can run in the background, I agree it would be nice to at least have an indication that it is running. For suspended apps, there is no need to be concerned at all. -- David Empson dempson@actrix.gen.nz |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| Copyright ©2007-2008 MacShock.com. |
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. |