![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This is good news for those of us who terminated our Verizon contracts when
we got our iPhones. -- Michelle http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-...30-710528.html (Updates with comment from Verizon Wireless; adds background) By Roger Cheng Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--A California appeals court upheld a $21 million refund that Verizon Wireless will have to pay to some of its customers as a result of a settlement of a class-action lawsuit over its early termination fees, according to the lawyer representing the plaintiffs. Each person in the class-action claim is estimated to receive $87.50 after challenging the carrier's practice of charging a $175 fee for breaking a wireless-service contract early. "Yesterday's ruling by the Court of Appeal confirms that this is a terrific settlement for Verizon Wireless customers, and now more than 175,000 of those customers will get a substantial refund," said Scott Bursor, lead attorney for the plaintiffs. A spokesman for Verizon Wireless said the settlement ended all of its early termination fee-related litigation, and doesn't relate to how the carrier currently charges those fees. Early termination fees have long been a hot-button issue for consumers and regulators, leading to increased scrutiny and legal action over the practice. The carriers argue the fees are necessary because they offset the costs incurred when subsidizing cellphones for subscribers. A basic Apple Inc. (AAPL) iPhone 4, for instance, would cost $200 with a two-year contract, but $600 if purchased without a service plan. The legal victory won't have a huge effect on current practices. The California case centered on the charging a flat $175 fee despite when a customer breaks the contract, so the amount would be the same if the person canceled the service in the first month or 23rd month. Since 2006, Verizon Wireless has begun to lower the early termination fee after each month goes by in a subscriber's contract, a practice that all of the carriers have shifted to. The original complaint dates back to 1999. A settlement was agreed upon in 2008, but two appeals were filed. An appeals court based in Alameda, Calif., rejected the appeals on Tuesday, noting the awards were justified. The funds have been kept in an escrow account. They can't be distributed until all appeals are used up, Bursor said, adding he expects the process to be completed within the next 60 days. Verizon Wireless raised eyebrows when it increased its early-termination fee on smartphones late last year. Earlier this month, AT&T Inc. (T) also raised its early-termination fee on smartphones. Both say the heavy subsidies they pay for expensive smartphones justify the move. Verizon Wireless is jointly owned by Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Vodafone Group PLC (VOD, VOD.LN). -- Check out the Hot Cocoa Party <http://www.hotcocoaparty.info> |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 07-01-2010 20:31, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> The funds have been kept in an escrow account. They can't be distributed > until all appeals are used up, Bursor said, adding he expects the process > to be completed within the next 60 days. I've been eligible several times for such a settlement. If this is anything like ALL of those, you will get a letter telling you that if you don't opt out, and if the settlement is approved, that you will get two or three dollars, the original plaintiff will get a couple thousand, and the lawyers will get several million. -- Wes Groleau Nutrition for Blokes: Re-engineering your diet for life http://www.phlaunt.com/quentin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| Copyright ©2007-2008 MacShock.com. |
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. |