![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 10/08/2011 10:12 AM, Alan Browne wrote:
> On 2011-10-08 00:23 , Paul M Westley wrote: >> Good news! It only cost Apple $200 million to catch up with Google's >> Voice action and V lingo. > > I doubt that the implementation and integration of functions with Siri > is anywhere matched by Voice and V. No. Mostly Google's software doesn't read the results back. Isn't it weird? This technology is 20 years old! As long as Apple was using Google software for searches, it was providing 2/3 of Google's voice searches. Now, Apple has Siri and a Cloud. >> "Today Apple announced the iPhone 4S which disappointed many who were >> expecting to see the iPhone 5. However, Apple was still able to excite >> the fanbase with the public demo Siri, a virtual personal assistant >> coming to iOS5 on October 12th. Apple acquired the company Siri for $200 >> million in April of last year and Steve Jobs described it as “artificial >> intelligence”, not search or speech recognition. > > From what I've read about the demo, Siri needs a slow, deliberate voice > input. Could be irritating. At 1:20, here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGbYV...layer_embedded Google software seems to be doing fine with fast voice input. No street noise, of course. > I'll stick to my iPhone 4 - likely for the next 4 years, at least. I > hardly use the voice recognition in it to dial. Only works with some > names and fails miserably when I'm driving (noise). Seems sound to me. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article
<yourname-0910111006130001@203-118-184-75.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz>, yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote: > In article <4qOdnfLuqu6rxw3TnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne > <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> wrote: > > > > From what I've read about the demo, Siri needs a slow, deliberate voice > > input. Could be irritating. > > > > I'll stick to my iPhone 4 - likely for the next 4 years, at least. I > > hardly use the voice recognition in it to dial. Only works with some > > names and fails miserably when I'm driving (noise). > > A "slow and deliberate input" didn't stop the Palm device becoming popular. > :-) > > Despite Star Trek fans dreams, I don't see voice input becoming very > popular. It might be fine if you're all by yourself in a quiet room ... I could find it quite useful if I could dictate to my Mac and have it appear as text in a document. Doing that at home would be very handy. -- Tim "That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689 |
|
| Copyright 2007-2008 MacShock.com. |
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. |