![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've seen (just) a few reports of folks whose original iPads turned into
paperweights after attempting to move from iOS 4.x to 5.x. Has anybody been able to figure out what went wrong for those folks? Was it just bad luck, or are there some easily avoidable pitfalls? Now that Stanza's been fixed for 5.0.1 but no longer works on 4.x, I'm inclined to move up. -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In news
nce-C4E2E3.09491912112011@news.eternal-september.org Gerry<once@around-the-block.org> wrote: > A report from MacWorld had Amazon hinting that this may be the last > upgrade to Stanza no further upgrades are planned. They also said that they wouldn't be providing a version to work on iOS 5. Now that they've alienated (at least temporarily) all those folks who either choose to or have to stay on iOS 4.x, maybe they'll thing again, again. -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 12 Nov 2011 17:55:14 GMT, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:
>Now that they've alienated (at least temporarily) all those folks who >either choose to or have to stay on iOS 4.x, maybe they'll thing again, >again. I reinstalled Stanza after going to 5.0.1 and it appears to be working ok. -- Carl Heinz cfheinz57@charter.net (Remove number) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In news:cddtb7dgfpi9iqlaqde12dq1nuirnggk5s@4ax.com Carl Heinz
<cfheinz57@charter.net> wrote: > On 12 Nov 2011 17:55:14 GMT, Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > >>Now that they've alienated (at least temporarily) all those folks who >>either choose to or have to stay on iOS 4.x, maybe they'll thing >>again, again. > > I reinstalled Stanza after going to 5.0.1 and it appears to be working > ok. That's right; the current version of Stanza no longer works on 4.x, only on 5.x. -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <Xns9F9B6DD9A6C3VeebleFetzer@216.250.188.141>,
Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > I've seen (just) a few reports of folks whose original iPads turned into > paperweights after attempting to move from iOS 4.x to 5.x. > > Has anybody been able to figure out what went wrong for those folks? Was > it just bad luck, or are there some easily avoidable pitfalls? It happened to me. I don't know to avoid it, but I did find how to fix it, as I posted here a few days ago: "Recapping: My original iPad failed on an attempted upgrade to IOS 5 with infamous "unknown error (1)". All of my attempts to recover failed. Apple Store "genius" pronounced it dead. Turns out there is a software fix for the apparent iTunes flaw, but it's offered by the same folks who provide jailbreak software, so Apple has been actively suppressing the info on the official support forums. I tried it, and it works. My iPad is now back among the living and happily running IOS 5. Here's the info: http://www.cultofmac.com/125326/pote...cked-first-gen -ipads/ " -- Wayne Marsh Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA waynegmarsh@mac.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In news:Xns9F9B6DD9A6C3VeebleFetzer@216.250.188.141 Bert
<bert@iphouse.com> wrote: > Now that Stanza's been fixed for 5.0.1 but no longer works on 4.x, I'm > inclined to move up. Well, I moved "up" to 5.0.1 and, while I did finally get things working again, it wasn't a pleasant experience. One thing I did see while performing the move is the iTunes for Windows is a really, really bad piece of software. Apple's developers might be wizards with their own hardware and OS, but they don't do Windows very well. During the update process, iTunes spent a lot of time apparently doing nothing, with no visible sign of activity. I can see how an impatient or unobservant user might conclude that it was done and terminate it prematurely, leaving their iThing in an unknown state. -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In news:jollyroger-7D4112.10183913112011@news.individual.net Jolly Roger
<jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > In article <Xns9F9C64DED9E8DVeebleFetzer@216.250.188.141>, > Bert <bert@iphouse.com> wrote: >> >> During the update process, iTunes spent a lot of time apparently >> doing nothing, with no visible sign of activity. I can see how an >> impatient or unobservant user might conclude that it was done and >> terminate it prematurely, leaving their iThing in an unknown state. > > It was probably restoring apps and data back to the iPad, which can > take quite a while over USB and even longer over WiFi. I have no doubt that it was very busy doing something very important; unfortunately, it gave no external indication, not even so much as an hourglass. -- bert@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| Copyright ©2007-2008 MacShock.com. |
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. |