![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The saga continues. Yay.
I replaced a blown transistor with an ECG290 a few hours ago. This fixed the all-red screen problem. When I attached a IIgs, the screen looked fine, except that there was no red. I took the case off of the monitor to fiddle with the controls for R Drive, R Cut-Off, B Drive, B Cut-Off, and G Cut-Off. After an hour or so of fiddling, I came to this disturbing conclusion: there was no way to accurately "mix" the red into the blue and green levels. Either there was too much red (where black == red), or there was not enough red. So, I seek two things: 1.) A comprehensive guide to adjusting the color on the AppleColor RGB monitor. 2.) Advice on whether this color issue is from the new transistor, and whether I should replace more transistors for the other color circuits. -- ]DF$ Mac GUI Vault - A source for retro Apple II and Macintosh computing. http://macgui.com/vault/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Dec 5, 8:21*pm, dog_...@macgui.com (D Finnigan) wrote:
> The saga continues. Yay. > > I replaced a blown transistor with an ECG290 a few hours ago. This fixed the > all-red screen problem. When I attached a IIgs, the screen looked fine, > except that there was no red. > > I took the case off of the monitor to fiddle with the controls for R Drive, > R Cut-Off, B Drive, B Cut-Off, and G Cut-Off. > > After an hour or so of fiddling, I came to this disturbing conclusion: there > was no way to accurately "mix" the red into the blue and green levels. > Either there was too much red (where black == red), or there was not enough > red. > > So, I seek two things: > > 1.) A comprehensive guide to adjusting the color on the AppleColor RGB > monitor. > > 2.) Advice on whether this color issue is from the new transistor, and > whether I should replace more transistors for the other color circuits. > > -- > ]DF$ > Mac GUI Vault - A source for retro Apple II and > Macintosh computing.http://macgui.com/vault/ are you positive the transistor is inserted correctly? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> wrote:
> Kevin Dady wrote: >> >> are you positive the transistor is inserted correctly? >> > > Fairly certain: the flat part of the transistor is facing up, and the > emitter and base legs are matching as shown on the board. > > I recall someone mentioning that when I replaced the transistor, the colors > would need to be adjusted. Presumably this would be because of the new > transistor having better specifications than its predecessor and brothers. ...or just slightly different characteristics, which would be expected even for an exact replacement. There is a prescribed order for making color adjustments, to ensure that the process converges. It would be best to find the service docs for this monitor for the procedure, or, failing that, review service docs for a comparable (in schematic) monitor or TV. What you have so far described could also result from either an improper replacement or additional failures in the circuit. If I were troubleshooting this monitor, I'd start with comparing voltages under black screen conditions for equivalent points in the three color channels. Big differences would be suspect, and could point to the cause. Next, DC signal injection at the inputs together with more comparable voltage measurements. The "screen", or DC, adjustments for two colors should be used to get a neutral gray background if the brightness is turned up a bit The channel gain controls should be set to get a neutral white on a monochrome pattern, like text. -michael - NadaNet 3.1 and AppleCrate II: http://home.comcast.net/~mjmahon |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Michael J. Mahon wrote:
> D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> wrote: >> Kevin Dady wrote: >>> >>> are you positive the transistor is inserted correctly? >>> >> >> Fairly certain: the flat part of the transistor is facing up, and the >> emitter and base legs are matching as shown on the board. >> >> I recall someone mentioning that when I replaced the transistor, the >> colors >> would need to be adjusted. Presumably this would be because of the new >> transistor having better specifications than its predecessor and >> brothers. > > ..or just slightly different characteristics, which would be expected even > for an exact replacement. > The ECG290A replaced an A673 transistor. In my original article from a month ago, I incorrectly stated that a C2688 transistor was bad. It wasn't; it was the A673 that was bad. Schematic: http://apple2.info/download/IIgsMon3b.pdf > There is a prescribed order for making color adjustments, to ensure that > the process converges. It would be best to find the service docs for this > monitor for the procedure, or, failing that, review service docs for a > comparable (in schematic) monitor or TV. I have been searching for the service manual for this monitor; I have not found it yet. > > What you have so far described could also result from either an improper > replacement or additional failures in the circuit. > > If I were troubleshooting this monitor, I'd start with comparing voltages > under black screen conditions for equivalent points in the three color > channels. Big differences would be suspect, and could point to the cause. > Yes, it definitely seems like a voltage problem. I noticed that turning any of the color adjustments up too high would result in an over-saturated, fuzzy screen. -- ]DF$ Mac GUI Vault - A source for retro Apple II and Macintosh computing. http://macgui.com/vault/ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
D Finnigan wrote:
> Michael J. Mahon wrote: > >>D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> wrote: >> >>>Kevin Dady wrote: >>> >>>>are you positive the transistor is inserted correctly? >>>> >>> >>>Fairly certain: the flat part of the transistor is facing up, and the >>>emitter and base legs are matching as shown on the board. >>> >>>I recall someone mentioning that when I replaced the transistor, the >>>colors >>>would need to be adjusted. Presumably this would be because of the new >>>transistor having better specifications than its predecessor and >>>brothers. >> >>..or just slightly different characteristics, which would be expected even >>for an exact replacement. >> > > > The ECG290A replaced an A673 transistor. > > In my original article from a month ago, I incorrectly stated that a C2688 > transistor was bad. It wasn't; it was the A673 that was bad. > > Schematic: > http://apple2.info/download/IIgsMon3b.pdf > > > >>There is a prescribed order for making color adjustments, to ensure that >>the process converges. It would be best to find the service docs for this >>monitor for the procedure, or, failing that, review service docs for a >>comparable (in schematic) monitor or TV. > > > I have been searching for the service manual for this monitor; I have not > found it yet. > > >>What you have so far described could also result from either an improper >>replacement or additional failures in the circuit. >> >>If I were troubleshooting this monitor, I'd start with comparing voltages >>under black screen conditions for equivalent points in the three color >>channels. Big differences would be suspect, and could point to the cause. >> > > > Yes, it definitely seems like a voltage problem. I noticed that turning any > of the color adjustments up too high would result in an over-saturated, > fuzzy screen. Actually, that's pretty normal. Overdriving the grid of a CRT causes that. First, try the easy things... ;-) I used generic color TV terms for the controls above. Using the terminology of the AppleColor RGB monitor, with no video input (should be black screen), and the brightness control set where it should be for a black screen with no video signal, adjust all of the "cutoff" controls so that the corresponding color just turns off. When they are all properly adjusted, you should have black, and even a small adjustment "up" on any control should cause the corresponding color to begin to appear. Then, apply a video signal that generates a white bar, for example, and adjust the blue drive and red drive to get a white bar. You may find that the contrast control needs adjustment to get an appropriate white level. If this works reasonably, display a color pattern with colors you know, including white and black. Touch up the controls *slightly* to get accurate colors. The color of "black" should not vary as you adjust the brightness control, and the color of "white" should not vary as you adjust the contrast control. If this procedure gets good colors, you're done! -michael NadaNet 3.1 for Apple II parallel computing! Home page: http://home.comcast.net/~mjmahon/ "The wastebasket is our most important design tool--and it's seriously underused." |
|
| Copyright ©2007-2008 MacShock.com. |
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. |