SMS

On 9/5/2010 12:05 PM, Lloyd Parsons wrote:
> In article<4c83e54b$0$1648$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
> SMS<scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/5/2010 5:07 AM, Walter Bushell wrote:
>>> In article<slrni85465.u88.ianji33@zenatode.org.uk>,
>>> Ian Gregory<ianji33@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What it comes down
>>>> to is a race between hardware manufacturers producing mobile platforms
>>>> that are fast enough and energy efficient enough to mask the horrible
>>>> performance of Flash,
>>>
>>> This would take a while. Flash causes problems on the latest macBook Pro
>>> 13"
>>
>> Wow, that's terrible!
>>
>> You might want to consider a Dell Mini-10V netbook and install Snow
>> Leopard on it (you can dual boot Windows and Snow Leopard if you wish).
>> Flash works fine on it, and doesn't have problems like the ones you
>> claim that the MacBook Pro has (which I highly doubt).
>>
>> > and it will be a while before the mobile processors get that good.
>>
>> Fortunately they're already "that good."
>
> Only in the minds of those that want to believe. Virtually every review
> and comment from those that have actually seen it on mobile devices says
> just the opposite.

Nope. Read the reviews.

What I'm more worried about though is the claim that a Macbook Pro
cannot do Flash properly. That's something Apple needs to fix right away
if it's true, which of course it isn't.