Re: Using old iPhone as an iPod touch-like device.
In article <i5r5iv$pl4$1@news.albasani.net>,
"Kate in MI" <grovesfam@NOcomcastSPAM.net> wrote:
> "SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
> news:4c811860$0$1629$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> > On 9/3/2010 8:39 AM, Kate in MI wrote:
> >> It says it is connecting.
> >>
> >> It shows the wireless group name in the Settings panel.
> >>
> >> FYI:
> >>
> >> Original iPhone.
> >>
> >> When I bought my iPhone 4 -- I activated it and synched it with iTunes
> >> and did nothing else with the old one. Did not "unactivate it". Did not
> >> remove SIM card.
> >>
> >> It shows NO SERVICE -- and does not show at all the WiFi symbol.
> >>
> >> I've turned ON the Airplane mode so it isn't looking for service. I'm
> >> stumped. I've googled the Web and have found several articles which
> >> don't lead my to try anything I haven't already tried.
> >
> > Are you sure that you turned Wi-Fi back on after you turned airplane mode
> > on. Airplane mode normally turns off all the radios, but you can turn the
> > Wi-Fi back on.
> >
> > "http://www.iphonealley.com/tips/enable-wi-fi-while-in-airplane-mode."
> >
> > Since many airplanes now offer Wi-Fi, this is a useful feature.
>
> Yes -- in the Settings Screen -- I see
>
> Wi-Fi -- ON
>
> Choose a network...
>
> Checkmark -- My Network Name -- the lock symbol -- the arcs
>
> But up next to the airplane in the top left --- NOTHING!!
Turn airplane mode off. That's likely the problem.
FYI:
You've been doing something we call "top posting" which is considered
improper etiquette in Usenet news groups such as this one. It's not the
end of the world, but may be something you wish to correct in the
future. Thankfully, it's easily remedied, and no level-headed person
will hold it against you if you correct your posting style now! As with
most things, the decision is yours - do whatever you think is best.
In your replies, you've been placing your reply at the very top, above
any quoted material. This can confuse the flow of conversation. In
general, when replying to a post, it is best to place your reply at the
bottom of the message just after any quoted material
In general, when replying to a post, it is best to place your reply at
the bottom of the message just after any quoted material
This should illustrate the problem to you:
A: Because it reverses the flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top-posting frowned upon on Usenet?
A: Top-posting (aka TOFU - Top-post Over, Full quote Under)
Q: What is one of the most annoying things in news groups?
As another example, let's say you read a thread about candy and wanted
to comment that you don't like candy very much. If you top posted, it
might look like this:
I don't like candy very much.
>>> I like candy.
>> Me too! It is sweet!
> I agree. I wish we had more.
If you bottom posted instead, the conversation would be much easier to
follow:
>>> I like candy.
>> Me too! It is sweet!
> I agree. I wish we had more.
I don't like candy very much.
Note: It's also considered good manners to delete the quoted material to
which you are replying as much as possible while still keeping some
context so that others know what you are referencing in your reply.
There are some great resources on the web for pretty much everything
you'd ever want to know about the subject. When you get a minute, you
might want to read these web pages:
Quoting Style:
<http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html>
Quoting How To:
<http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html>
Posting Style:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style>
RFC 1855 - Netiquette Guidelines:
<http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html>
The Netiquette Book:
<http://www.albion.com/netiquette/book/>
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
|