Sythos

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:14:11 -0500
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

> > The issue is still content. Until the world's Flash content is
> > replaced with something better, "bad" flash is better than no
> > flash. The user can decide whether putting up with the performance
> > issues is worth it.
>
> It doesn't matter anymore. The battle is lost for Adobe. Flash, like
> it or not, will remain largely irrelevant for mobile devices. And
> that's as it should be.

flash game on a HTC device (HD2) drain battery in 1h, a flash
compatible software player (gnash) and a game from miniclip.comn on a
JB 3GS iphone drain battery like a 3D game (1,5H more or less) [if my
clock don't lie, i've not taken sharpe time with a chrono), i think this
is the real reason why Flash isn't good for a movable device,
from Abode or from another source, due some architetture of Fl
ash than use a lot of CPU (obviously, a lot can say the shorter life of
a device is a fault of software, but i bet a lot give the cause to
manufacturer of device for "poor" battery capacity)

ajax, html5, WebGL and other existing tools can supply widely in a lot
of applications, just need a browser capable and a OpenGL ES (or more)
driver on device

*imho*